Follow @Nomad4rum
Find us on facebook

obstruction

[ Facebook comments]

Ask our resident Ref(s) your questions here.

Moderators: octopus, Shiner, Gareth D, gonzo, The Tye

Opens in new browser window

obstruction

Postby Sidney » Fri Jan 23 2009, 12:03

I've always wondered why a defender is allowed to make no attempt to play the ball and block a striker letting the ball go off for a goal-kick. ( Don't know if i've explained that very well but you know what I mean) where as the same action anywhere else on the pitch results in a free-kick. Is there some sort of rule I'm not aware of :?:
Men's best successes come after their disappointments.
User avatar
Sidney
 
Posts: 348
Joined: Mon Oct 13 2008, 10:25
Location: of no fixed abode

Opens in new browser window

Postby stringz » Fri Jan 23 2009, 12:25

Hi Sidney, very good question that does deserve some form of explaination (by the way it is now known as impeding, poncy I know but hey!). When shielding the ball going out for a goal kick (or corner) providing that the ball is still within playing distance this is a perfectly legitimate tactic (attackers do it when going into the corner for example). However, if the ball is not within playing distance than a free kick should be awarded. Usually, they are given in open play when the player is impeded with little or no attempt to play the ball. The goal kick type scenario has crept in but on occasion I do give against the defender if he deviates from the ball ie jinx about or sticks his backside out.

Hope that helps (I've read it back and it is still as clear as mud!)
User avatar
stringz
 
Posts: 361
Joined: Mon Nov 20 2006, 11:48
Location: Referee

Opens in new browser window

Postby Sidney » Fri Jan 23 2009, 18:14

Cheers. makes a little sense :)
Men's best successes come after their disappointments.
User avatar
Sidney
 
Posts: 348
Joined: Mon Oct 13 2008, 10:25
Location: of no fixed abode

Opens in new browser window

Return to Ask the Ref!



Opens in new browser window